Skip to content

The motivation–impact gap in pro-environmental clothing consumption

  • Capstick, S. et al. in Emission Gap Report 2020 Ch. 6 (UNEP, 2020).

  • van Vuuren, DP et al. Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nat. Clim. Change 8391–397 (2018).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hmm. You decide. Process. fifty179–211 (1991).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Stern, PC, Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, GA & Kalof, L. A value–belief–norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hmm. Ecol. Rev. 681–97 (1999).

    Google Scholar

  • Klöckner, CA A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—a meta-analysis. glob. Environment. Change 231028–1038 (2013).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Klöckner, CA & Blöbaum, A. A comprehensive action determination model: toward a broader understanding of ecological behavior using the example of travel mode choice. J. Environment. Psychol. 30574–586 (2010).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Nielsen, KS, Cologna, V., Lange, F., Brick, C. & Stern, PC The case for impact-focused environmental psychology. J. Environment. Psychol. 74101559 (2021).

  • Kaiser, FG & Wilson, M. Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance. Pers. Individual differ. 361531–1544 (2004).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Brick, C., Sherman, DK & Kim, HS “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior. J. Environment. Psychol. 51226–238 (2017).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Dietz, T., Gardner, GT, Gilligan, J., Stern, PC & Vandenbergh, MP Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 10618452–18456 (2009).

    CAS Article Google Scholar

  • Allen, S., Dietz, T. & McCright, AM Measuring household energy efficiency behaviors with attention to behavioral plasticity in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 10133–140 (2015).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, H.-S. & Damhorst, ML Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Cloth. Text. Res.J. 16126–133 (1998).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Bleys, B., Defloor, B., Van Ootegem, L. & Verhofstadt, E. The environmental impact of individual behavior: self-assessment versus the ecological footprint. Environment. Behav. fifty187–212 (2018).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Kennedy, EH et al. Are we counting what counts? A closer look at environmental concern, pro-environmental behaviour, and carbon footprint. Local Environment. twenty220–236 (2015).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Moser, S. & Kleinhückelkotten, S. Good intents, but low impacts: diverging importance of motivational and socioeconomic determinants explaining behavior, energy use, and carbon footprint. Environment. Behav. 6626–656 (2018).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Ivanova, D. et al. Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environment. Res. Lett. fifteen093001 (2020).

    CAS Article Google Scholar

  • Peters, G., Li, M. & Lenzen, M. The need to decelerate fast fashion in a hot climate—a global sustainability perspective on the garment industry. J. Clean. Prod. 295126390 (2021).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Niinimäki, K. et al. The environmental price of fast fashion. Nat. Rev. Earth Environment. one189–200 (2020).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Kraha, A., Turner, H., Nimon, K., Zientek, LR & Henson, RK Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Front. Psychol. 344 (2012).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Gwozdz, W., Nielsen, KS & Müller, T. An environmental perspective on clothing consumption: consumer segments and their behavioral patterns. Sustainability 9762 (2017).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Sohn, J., Nielsen, KS, Birkved, M., Joanes, T. & Gwozdz, W. The environmental impacts of clothing: evidence from United States and three European countries. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 272153–2164 (2021).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Nielsen, KS From prediction to process: a self-regulation account of environmental behavior change. J. Environment. Psychol. 51189–198 (2017).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Roos, S., Sandin, G., Zamani, B., Peters, G. & Svanström, M. in Textiles and Clothing Sustainability (ed. Muthu, SS) 1–45 (Springer, 2017).

  • A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning Fashion’s Future (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017); https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/a-new-textiles-economy

  • R Core Team A: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012); https://www.r-project.org/

  • Behrendt, S. Lm.beta: Add Standardized Regression Coefficients to lm-Objects. R package version 1.5-1 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lm.beta/lm.beta.pdf (2014).

  • Joanes, T. Personal norms in a globalized world: norm-activation processes and reduced clothing consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 212941–949 (2019).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Joanes, T., Gwozdz, W. & Klöckner, CA Reducing personal clothing consumption: a cross-cultural validation of the comprehensive action determination model. J. Environment. Psychol. 71101396 (2020).

  • Nielsen, KS, Gwozdz, W. & De Ridder, D. Unraveling the relationship between trait self-control and subjective well-being: the mediating role of four self-control strategies. Front. Psychol. 10706 (2019).

  • Nielsen, KS, Bauer, JM & Hofmann, W. Examining the relationship between trait self-control and stress: evidence on generalizability and outcome variability. J. Res. Pers. 84103901 (2020).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Nielsen, KS & Bauer, JM The merits of goal support as a self-control strategy. Soc. Psychol. Staff. Sci. 10671–680 (2019).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.